I've been doing some reading recently for a class that I'm a good amount behind on. I have about 3 assignments to do. Since I'm not too motivated to do them, I'm writing a post about the first one, in hopes that it will get me motivated in starting to write it. I'm experiencing a bit of a block on where to start.

One of the pieces is an excerpt of the Evangelical Manifesto. It is made up of several sections, which were written as a repudiation of several practices of American Evangelicalism. The manifesto starts off by reclaiming what it means "to be an Evangelical and to carry the name of Christ: to seek to be faithful to the freedom, justice, peace, and well-being that are at the heart of the kingdom of God, to bring these gifts into public life as a service to all, and to work with all who share these ideals and care for the common good." Evangelicals are to be people who are a part of a different tradition: One that brings change and social reform.

Our second piece is an Open Letter from President Mahmood Ahmadi-Najad to President Bush. In his opening, he writes: "Can one be a follower of Jesus Christ (PBUH), the great Messenger of God, feel obligated to respect human rights, present liberalism as a civilization model, announce one's opposition to the proliferation of nuclear weapons and WMDs, make 'War and Terror' his slogan, and finally, work toward the establishment of a unified international community - a community which Christ and the virtuous of the Earth will one day govern?"

At the outset, both pieces define what Christians should be about; they bring to light what it looks like to carry the name of Christ and work toward the establishment of a community ultimately governed by Christ. This is capital Religion in the public eye: the way a person's beliefs influence their actions. "Let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven." Matthew 5:16 (TNIV)

The President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmood Ahmadi-Najad, considers how one might shine like a light from a position of authority by defending the rights of the underprivileged, defending the rights of all people around the world by not imposing wars on them, or interfering illegally in their affairs, or establishing hellish prisons to incarcerate some of them. He questions if it would be a good idea to bring the world peace and security, and tell truth to our nation and others around the world. He goes on to ask if President Bush should be on the side of the people, to serve the people, which is a leader's main task.

The Evangelical Manifesto says the same thing. It is not the duty of a Christian to put faith in and imitate the power held by Emperor Constantine but rather Jesus of Nazareth's. It is power under, "Justice was promoted by a suffering servant emptied of power and ready to die for the ends he came to achieve." Were a president to actually follow the teachings of Jesus, they may find themselves out of a job... or they may find themselves redefining what the position should look like.

There is no doubt that many Americans would be very unhappy if a president actually helped "the foreigner, the fatherless, and the widow." Imagine if instead of a 700 billion dollar bail out plan, the United States enabled people all over the world to have access to clean drinking water. It would cause uproar. Or instead of raising taxes for people who make over 250 thousand dollars a year, cap it, and give the rest away to people who really need it. Or, what if America got rid of the welfare system and healthcare system and said, "okay, the new law is: everyone love your neighbour!"

This obviously would never work for real. America is not a theocracy and Americans are far too selfish. If honest moral ideals were put into place within government, and actually followed, it could work. But it never will.

Thus: application of the “power-under” idea of the Christian church. A group of people so indwelt with the gospel that they spur major movements in social change. A group of people so convinced that the prisons need reform that they would readily swap seats with the man on death row, guilty as hell. Not to prove a point, but to give life. It looks like a group of people willing to move into the ghetto and provide gentrification with justice; using their God-given talents and abilities in their business and trades to bring change to corrupted and broken neighbourhoods. It looks like a group of people who are doctors who offer free care and supplies to those unable to afford adequate care. It looks like a group of people who love their “enemies” so much that they fly to Baghdad two weeks before the bombings and embrace their brothers and sisters abroad, showing them what Christ actually looks like.

The American Church has lost its imagination. The Evangelical Manifesto conveys that American Christians have put far too much faith in political systems and leaders than in the actual teachings of Jesus to change people from the inside out: to transform lives and the world around them. Mahmood Ahmadi-Najad imagines what it might look like for a professing Christian leader to do the same thing. It could be a different world indeed.

darius rucker

ha. new cd. country.

trembling car. sparked ignition; praises. smoke danced down the street toward home. all i need are three good days away, then i'll never come back.

the small village speckled in the rearview, with one last hill, it'll disappear. music, applause, that'll clear my head thoughts. good thoughts.

whispering static. no fm. great. what's on the am?

--zzZZT--
-- ave a good night, excite---
ain't nothin but a hou--
---ust in jesus to forgive you from y---

finally, a weather station. "goodbye hurricane! come bustin' doors, never believed it'd be over this fast. torn down three buildings since yesterday. first downed he---"

buzzing. lights from the passenger seat. a picture.

i wonder who it is... i'll check. no, i can't. i never liked it there.

new phase

how come i didn't know? why didn't they tell me? i'm actually quite angry. the fresh city near my house has closed. i had no idea...

i should have a clever metaphor for telling you how i feel about this. unfortunately, i don't. but i do have a story. or at least a story about a story.

as i may have mentioned before: i have a new typewriter. this thing is fantastic. i'm currently in the process of writing a sassy piece of text on it. my goal: to explain santa claus.

more updates soon.
it happens about once a year. i update my blog's theme. it happened a lot last year. i wish i had some screenshots to show you. but i'm liking this one currently. it's funky, albeit a little dated. but that's kind of what i like about it i think. anywho, let me know what your thoughts are.

anomie?!


two words: mythic time. also i think adrienne will appreciate this post. haha.

dollar store snacks

are off the hook, yo.

heaven?

let me ask you a question:

have you ever wished you could go back to when you were xx years old with all that you know now?

yes?

well... not me.

have you ever had to repeat a class that you understood everything, but my not have gotten a great grade? i think repeating life with "what we know now" would be like it. i think it would be incredibly boring. part of the excellence in life is the discovery of new things... while we could definitely discover things if we were to live life again with a cursory knowledge of events, we may be constantly trying so hard not to make a mistake that we'd fail to enjoy it the second time around.

or perhaps, we'd be so fast-tracked through life, being a six year old in college, because we're unable to enjoy kindergarten because it's so far below us, that we'd miss out on a lot of life experiences we would have had otherwise. life as a genius might be nice if you want climb intellectually, but it doesn't suit the majority of us who aren't intellectuals.

anywho, just thoughts.

would you go back with all you know now?

i've been surprised

by a few things, but one stands out in particular at this moment: the amount of famous vegetarians there are. check out the more notable ones, and also the A-Z list.

i begin to write

phrases so simple they could only compose a piece of a larger symphony. the sound swells around me. growing, evolving revolution to my ears. the swaying rhythms run helter-skelter only to discover i am in tune with a greater universe. something spiritual is in the room with me.

when i open my eyes to the world awake,
i feel a need. a need to create.

something has been occurring to me recently. humankind not only has an innate ability to create, but also we have something placed deep within us that kindles the desire.

as creatures, we naturally externalise. not only do we create in our heads, but we also create outside of ourselves. we create art and compose music, we write books on philosophy and religion, we travel the world and share our experiences, we broadcast our ideas of God and the greater cosmos, and we form societies and cultures. all of this happens within ourselves and moves outward. all of this happens in community.

any person remaining in solitude will eventually go mad. this is not a traditional descent to madness, but rather the need to externalize becomes so strong that one begins to seek externalisation from inexternalisable objects. (1) there is a natural need within us for community. if we cannot find it, we seek to create it.

i have been learning that God is, God has been, and God will be. within this, i am discovering that God exists around us, outside of us, and within us. christian theologians say that God has three parts. this is known as the trinity. as best as i can impart: God can be described as the perfect unity of the father, son, and the holy sprit, who exist altogether equal as God. just one part would not be enough to describe all of who God is.

i believe we have a necessity to externalise because every human individual has the image of God built inside them. any interaction with another person is a sacred treasure. this is why our greatest commands are to love God and to love our neighbour. (2) these cannot be separated. it would make sense that someone would descend to madness if they had no interaction with the visible image of God built into other people.

follow me as we take a significant leap:

God knew to give us the command to love our neighbour, because God, in creating us, knew that we would need this interaction. (3) while we are commanded to love and serve the people around us, it is even more basically a command to have people around us. when we disobey the command to be relational, our worlds fall apart. we cannot begin to love God if we cannot begin to love our neighbour.


(1) wilson the volleyball in the movie castaway.

(2) deut 6:5, lev 19:18

(3) in the biblical creation account: adam had no suitable helper, so God created one for him. Gen 2:18

happy for a purpose

the click-clack of keys under fingers, as lines conclude, resonating ping. what satisfaction sound amplified.

needful to say: today, i got my first typewriter.

it's deeply romantic. i can't wait to type my first major works.

hi, i'm a pc

i'm also a mac.
and i drive a subaru.

conclusion:
subaru drivers are adaptable and diverse.

cereal boxes and the toys inside them

i think it would be interesting to note that i have my own action figure. yes. but i also realize that there is also a need to appropriate an explanation. for this, i will shortly do. for some time, my shocking similarities to jeff goldblum have been compared. while i am quite flattered by the comparison, i must say that while we are similar in that we are both famous actors, incredibly good looking, fashionable, great at cooking, a hit with the ladies, and real life action heros: he and i don't carry much similarity having to do with appearance.

now, one might argue: hey, you both wear glasses, have dark hair, and share some other physical characteristics. to which, i would reply: the eyes are the greatest center for similarity in facial features, goldbum and i do not share the same eye shape, eye color, or even eyelash color and density. how, i wouldn't compare olson to any of the members in the swedish band abba, just because they share the same eye color... now, i recognize that there are some similarities, as i have stated, however, none that are convincing enough. for the sake of this argument, i created an account with MyHeritage.com and had them analyze some photographs and prepare a celebrity look-a-likes. i gave them pictures of myself both with glasses on and with them off. the results are slightly different both times. it would be important to note that goldblum never came up. not once. i've uploaded several of the examples here: